Unbelievable but true! Today we celebrate the fourth round of the section devoted to film this (read more but still little read) blog!
Week wretched than the other episodes but definitely exciting! I was so inspired by the films viewed are also able to find a new title for the book (the first was very bad, let's say).
1) Tron Legacy ( strictly) 3D Joseph Kasinski (2010)
Kasinski The film is a sci-fi definitely above average special effects above average, above average solutions directing, soundtrack and exciting futuristic (Daft Punk, responsible the music, also appear in an amazing scene), a brilliant cast. Or rather, Jeff Bridges (Oh, Dude!) Brilliant. The rest of the cast quite goes unnoticed (if we exclude the brief but dazzling appearance of Michael Sheen), especially the main character (Garrett Hedlund) fairly static and impersonal (WARNING: è stata una delle mie cotte adolescenziali in Troy dove interpretava il "cugino" di Achille, Patroclo).
Per il resto, un film davvero sensazionale nel senso letterale del termine,con qualche spunto di riflessione non male (la dittatura, la ricerca della perfezione, lo sterminio dei "diversi",la resistenza e tutti i buoni sentimenti che si devono mettere in un bel polpettone che solo gli ameriggani sanno fare così bene).
In effetti il film rimane quel che è: produzioni megagalattiche che allow you to travel to other worlds, to give strong emotions and identification with the hero / babe of the moment (there are two here because there's Jeff Bridges younger!), and enjoy your well-deserved catharsis.
I mean really cool for the pure of heart, certainly not for the nagging / pseudo intellectuals / barbossissimi Criticón film. I liked it so much.
2) Watchmen's Zach Snyder (2009)
3) Paul Thomas Anderson's Boogie Nights (1997)
was a bit 'that I had into her head to see this movie, just to complete the filmography of one of the most brilliant thing I've seen in action at this time. And behold! What I find? To have already seen a couple of years ago, in late evening on the network 4, though at the time had just entered adolescence, and the film I had mistaken for a pseudo pornazzo. Reviewing today clearly has a completely different effect.
The most "bad" Anderson, unquestionably. Even if the oil is approaching a lot, but it has some sort of epic that makes it more "acceptable". Instead Boogie Nights has nothing epic, indeed, is a history of mediocre to poor wallow in a puddle of mediocrity (I'm short of words, I know). B-movie atmosphere lingers, not the movie but the characters (by the way, Mark Wahlberg is definitely underrated in that regard you see The Departed Scosese), puppets of destiny hour comedy mocking the tragic hours of a fluctuating reputation and squalid (yield perfectly into the world of porn).
film dense and somewhat difficult. Anderson does not disappoint this time either, confirms his skillful investigator of the human psyche and the "spirit of time ', called Zeitgeist, perhaps much more present here than in any other films thanks to the historical-political scenario of 70-80 years, full of ideas and symbolic events.
really Film interesting, with different levels of hours reading political, social hour, now psychological, and good ideas (I found it extremely fascinating attachment to his alter-ego, a symbol of redemption, of success, so the protagonists as a different reading of the sex more joyful well-being but frustration and professional obligation), not counting the peaks of narration very effective (Anderson certainly knows how to do his job). Despite the beauty of this film, I always prefer oil for several reasons, first of all and perhaps most importantly, his epic (which I have already spoken. Yes, I know, they are repetitive) totally absent here and, indeed , offset by a realsimo nihilistic.
film dense and somewhat difficult. Anderson does not disappoint this time either, confirms his skillful investigator of the human psyche and the "spirit of time ', called Zeitgeist, perhaps much more present here than in any other films thanks to the historical-political scenario of 70-80 years, full of ideas and symbolic events.
really Film interesting, with different levels of hours reading political, social hour, now psychological, and good ideas (I found it extremely fascinating attachment to his alter-ego, a symbol of redemption, of success, so the protagonists as a different reading of the sex more joyful well-being but frustration and professional obligation), not counting the peaks of narration very effective (Anderson certainly knows how to do his job). Despite the beauty of this film, I always prefer oil for several reasons, first of all and perhaps most importantly, his epic (which I have already spoken. Yes, I know, they are repetitive) totally absent here and, indeed , offset by a realsimo nihilistic.
0 comments:
Post a Comment